From 6a65388aea0e287417b05b86cdc78a1fe7b048aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lars Buitinck <L.J.Buitinck@uva.nl>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:01:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Be more explicit about coverage testing

---
 doc/developers/index.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/developers/index.rst b/doc/developers/index.rst
index d23bd8730e..b89ca98eb7 100644
--- a/doc/developers/index.rst
+++ b/doc/developers/index.rst
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ complies with the following rules:
     * Code with a good unittest coverage (at least 80%), check with::
 
         $ pip install nose coverage
-        $ nosetests --with-coverage path/to/package
+        $ nosetests --with-coverage path/to/tests_for_package
 
     * All other tests pass when everything is rebuilt from scrath, under Unix,
       check with (from the toplevel source folder)::
-- 
GitLab