From 6a65388aea0e287417b05b86cdc78a1fe7b048aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Buitinck <L.J.Buitinck@uva.nl> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:01:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Be more explicit about coverage testing --- doc/developers/index.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/developers/index.rst b/doc/developers/index.rst index d23bd8730e..b89ca98eb7 100644 --- a/doc/developers/index.rst +++ b/doc/developers/index.rst @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ complies with the following rules: * Code with a good unittest coverage (at least 80%), check with:: $ pip install nose coverage - $ nosetests --with-coverage path/to/package + $ nosetests --with-coverage path/to/tests_for_package * All other tests pass when everything is rebuilt from scrath, under Unix, check with (from the toplevel source folder):: -- GitLab